Diagnosing dementia is a complex and difficult process. There is no single test that can tell that someone has or does not have Alzheimer's or a related disease. Making a diagnosis of dementia takes the time and expertise of skilled practitioners because the diagnosis can only be made after a systematic assessment that takes into account other possible causes for the symptoms (including conditions such as depression, thyroid or heart disease, infections, drug interactions or alcohol abuse).
The diagnostic process therefore requires a careful history of the symptoms, physical, neurological and mental status examinations, psychiatric and psychological evaluations, laboratory tests, and where applicable imaging of the brain. Information from relatives or caregivers is also required.
As concern about Alzheimer's increases, some have argued that population-based screening (also referred to as broad screening) should be offered for dementia. Screening is a process by which individuals who have no symptoms or other indication of a specific disease are checked to determine whether they might have signs of that disease. Screening should be undertaken only when there is clear evidence that early treatment of the condition results in more good than harm. (Examples of effective screening programs include testing for high blood pressure and certain cancers.)
At this time, based on direction from Canada's leading Alzheimer Clinicians and Researchers, as well as the conclusions of evidence-based task forces in Canada, the US and the UK, the Alzheimer Society does not support population-based screening for memory or cognitive problems, regardless of whether these screenings take place in a primary care setting, a pharmacy or other non-clinical public location.
The Alzheimer Society continues to promote the early detection of dementia, thereby allowing people with the disease and their families to make key financial and care decisions while they are still functioning at the highest possible level. However, the Society will not advocate for population-based screening until there is evidence that there are effective and validated screening tools and that the benefits outweigh any potential harm.
Used in isolation from clinical settings and in the absence of other critical examinations and tests, there is a disturbing lack of accuracy inherent to using mass screening diagnostic tools currently available. There is evidence that as many as 15 to 20 per cent of normal individuals will be falsely labeled as having a problem (i.e. false positive). An equivalent number of individuals with true cognitive problems may identified as normal (i.e. false negatives).
Research to develop and validate reliable early screening tools continues, and eventually we may be able to screen appropriately for Alzheimer's disease in the general population. The validation of a screening program requires well designed randomized controlled trials and the comparison between current medical diagnoses with a formal screening program with a large enough number of people to be certain that the screening program is accurate.
For the present, no screening tool has the accuracy of the current medical diagnosis. Pressures to institute screening programs with unproven accuracy and benefit could divert much-needed resources from the health and social care systems and have overall negative consequences for care of patients with dementia and other illnesses. 1
The Alzheimer Society continues to recommend that people who are concerned about their memory and cognitive health see their family physician. Those who do not have a family doctor should contact their local Alzheimer Society to learn more about the disease, and how to find resources for appropriate diagnosis, treatment and care within their community.
Endnote
1. Dementia Screening in Primary Care Is It Time? JAMA, November 28, 2007—Vol 298, No. 20